Semantics for a New Ager

I'm still listening to the Nightline Face-off "Existence of Satan" debate.

I'm getting very frustrated with Deepak Chopra's new age semantics. He tries to use words that we know, but in fact, he does not mean what we think him to mean. When he says "god", he could very well mean "energy force", "evolution" is "good", "entropy" is "evil" and the list of such words goes on.

Friends, lets not argue too quickly with non-believers. If you do feel the need to set someone right, define the terms first. Otherwise, check their motivation. If they are truly seeking the truth, help them. However, if they are just looking for a fight, just move on and go to the hungry. Time is short.

Would We Argue If We Defined the Terms?

I've just been listening to the Nightline Face-off "Existence of Satan" debate. I get so frustrated listening to the debaters. Deepak Chopra is getting on my nerves right now. He should have no right to say "God is love" because his "god" is not God. I wish someone had asked him to define the term or not use it.